hearts and minds

October 8, 2006

Vote NO, NO, NO in NOvember

Filed under: government budgets,Taxes,War on Terror — Hearts & Minds @ 1:36 pm

The total cost of Congressional appropriations for the invasion and occupation of Iraq since 2003 has risen to a third of a trillion dollars. The portion of that 333 billion that Ozaukee County taxpayers have to pay is 117 million dollars. But those numbers don’t mean much to most of us. So I’m breaking it down here for mulling over a coffee or a beer or at the kitchen table.

117 million dollars comes to a dollar a second just from Ozaukee County taxpayers, just for the war in Iraq. A dollar every second for the last three and a half years. 117 million dollars averages close to three thousand dollars per household, so far. 117 million dollars is a little over a dollar apiece per day, since March, 2003, from each and every man, woman and child living in Ozaukee County. 117 million dollars is Ozaukee County’s portion of what is appropriated for whatever the U.S. government has spent so far in Iraq. Spent for things like no-bid contracts (with no performance reviews) that are handed to favored war-profiteering corporations, including private “interrogators” and mercenaries.

During the period since the invasion began, the annual total property tax levy in Ozaukee County has averaged about 165 million dollars. Our property taxes fund our police and ambulance and fire and emergency services, and sewage and water and garbage and courts and jails and roads and community college and Lasata Care Center, and basically, all local and county government services. And all our public schools, too.

Bottom line is, one dollar has been charged by the federal government to Ozaukee County taxpayers just for the War in Iraq for every five dollars we pay in total property tax billings since March 2003.

(The current Iraq conflict has already lasted as long as “the duration” that the United States fought to defeat Germany and Italy and Japan in World War II, with no end in sight in Iraq, and with more fish that also had nothing to do with 9-11 that the Administration is thinking of frying elsewhere.)

Think of it as a generous 20 percent gratuity. Now how long do you think we ought to continue paying that fat “tip”? Are you ready yet to add another open-ended “gratuity” to pay for an additional show in, say, Iran? How about for “waging war … throughout the world … until … citizens of all countries can be assured of their safety” as the Ozaukee County War referendum asks?

As everyone knows, we’re closing schools, and can’t find the money to fix a school roof and maintain the physical plant. Employees are getting their health care coverage cut back. School boards are trying to load extra work on teachers with no extra pay. They’re cutting back on art and music and other valuable and important educational services. We can’t even come up with the money to build a sorely needed library. Why? ‘Cause we “ain’t got the dough” for these kind of “frills” in Ozaukee County! That’s why.

This “Iraq gratuity” is being paid in every county across America. And it often cuts even deeper and closer to the bone elsewhere than it does here in Ozaukee County. How the devil is the rest of Wisconsin and America doing, coughing up this fear-induced extortion to pay for the federal government’s misbegotten, mismanaged, scandal ridden, “cost-plus”, tragedy-without-end in Iraq?

What are we getting for this? What’s anybody getting that’s worth the hundred thousand lives lost, and the terrible injuries to bodies, minds, families, and communities?

What is anyone getting that’s worth invading a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9-11, and had no means whatsoever to attack us militarily?

That’s worth gaining the enmity and mistrust of so many people around the world who used to be our sympathetic friends?

That’s worth the loss of our own self-esteem for failing to honor our history as a courageous, freedom loving, Constitution protecting, nation of laws?

Not to mention the outrageous financial cost to us and to everyone, of the inauspicious beginning to this ill-conceived War to End Terror Throughout the World. (A cost to everyone, that is, except a few very well-heeled, well-placed, war profiteers.)

Vote NO in NOvember on the stupid War Question. It’s not a referendum to support the troops. Read the entire sentence, beyond the first ddozen words, before you vote. You’ll see. It’s a referendum for a perpetual war of aggression and subsequent occupations, with ever mounting costs of attrition and no prospect of victory because no enemy is identified, and the goals are unrealistic. That’s no way, any day, to support the troops.

And vote NO on the stupid Death Penalty Question. It will cost Wisconsin taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars just to establish the infrastructure and underpinnings for it, even if nobody is ever executed. It doesn’t deter murder. Canada’s murder rate dropped and kept dropping AFTER they abolished the death penalty. States without the death penalty have a lower murder rate than states that have the death penalty. The death penalty is unfair. Nobody wealthy has ever been executed for murder in the U.S. What kind of a “Conservative”, what kind of a “Christian” could be in favor of reversing the proud accomplishment of our pioneer ancestors who abolished capital punishment here in 1853 and led the way for all of Europe and most of the rest of the world’s nations in the century and a half that followed their inspiring decision? Don’t let those wild spending, hot-button-pushing legislators turn our back on the proud legacy left by our pioneer founders of Wisconsin.

And the Amendment to Ban Civil Unions? It’s fair enough for the state to say that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. (Although I’m puzzled how the state will enforce this provision. Mandatory physical exams? Genetic sampling? Don’t ask, don’t tell?) But aside from that, that’s not all that fool amendment states. It’s the words that follow that proposed definition that are mean spirited and hurtful of good, loving people and nurturing families and children who depend on supportive government policies. Vote NO and tell the legislature to try again, if they must, but this time, leave out all that unnecessary, unworthy junk they added to the simple definition of marriage.

Vote like you’re not a fraidy cat and vote like the future depends upon your considered good judgment.

October 8, 2006

Advertisements

5 Comments »

  1. Thank you for taking the time to visit us in our home yesterday. We enjoyed the articles you left with us. While we’re not sure we will be able to attend the forum you mentioned, we appreciate knowing that there is a progressive voice in Ozaukee County. We support you.

    Comment by Phil & Amanda — October 23, 2006 @ 4:15 pm | Reply

  2. I’d say, vote against bringing back capital punishment, and vote against waging war as a way to end terrorism. As for the marriage amendment, I’d vote against it also, because it is unnecessary to amend the constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman because that is already the defintion. And on the principle of unintended consequences, and about respecting the wisdom of our elders who came up with the system, I am conservative about changing the constitution. However I would not support a law that allows same-sex “marriage.” I would support legislation recognizing equivalent legal unions, that uses less inflammatory terminology, besides “marriage” and “wedding.”

    Comment by Laurel — February 16, 2007 @ 8:16 pm | Reply

  3. I thought your latest article on the three referenda was excellent. Todays Milwaukee J/S has a short article reviewing the results of a study just published today in the British Medical Journal The Lancet. It is an update of the original survey which was conducted last fall. It’s a scientific survey of a random sample of households in Iraq which estimates excess deaths over what would be expected prior to our 2003 war. The current estimate as of July, 2006 is 655,000! Of that number of post-invasion deaths, 601,027 were estimated due to violence with a 95% confidence interval (error band) of 426,369 to 793,663! These are remarkable figures and exceed Bush administration reports by more than a factor of 10. Another lie by the Bush administration…this time about Iraqi civilian deaths. The Lancet is a highly respected international medical journal. The methodology here is quite good (I taught an advanced survey research methods course at UW-M). You can read the entire study at: http://www.thelancet.com. or print it out.

    Comment by Ken — February 16, 2007 @ 8:52 pm | Reply

  4. Another good one Clyde!

    Comment by Neil — February 16, 2007 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

  5. NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR:

    Unfortunately, both the referenda advisory question on the death penalty, and the marriage amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution, were approved by voters, both statewide, and in Ozaukee County in the November general election. And the county referendum advisory question supporting military war on terror was approved in Ozaukee County.

    Comment by clyde — February 20, 2007 @ 11:23 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: